Archive

Posts Tagged ‘school’

Fourth-grade filmmaker sneaks a camera into the cafeteria to document his gross school lunch

May 21st, 2013 admin No comments

school-lunch-hp

Public schools increasingly talk a good game about the healthy stuff they’re serving for lunch. But the meals don’t always match the menu, as Zachary Maxwell discovered as a fourth grader. Maxwell sneakily recorded the gross lunches at his school, and from that footage was born his aptly titled documentary, Yuck.

Getting this footage wasn’t easy, he told The New York Times:

His hidden-camera documentary was almost derailed last year when he was caught filming without permission by a fearsome enforcer — the lunchroom monitor in his school cafeteria.

“She sent me to my teacher, and my teacher told me to delete everything,” said Zachary, who is now 11.

Zachary pretended to delete the day’s shots. After that lapse in production security, he said, “I fired my lookouts.”

But it was worth it: He proved to his parents that the food the school was promising — dishes like lasagna rolls and roasted spinach — weren’t what he was being served (grilled cheese). And the film’s been winning all kinds of accolades. If you live in New York, you can catch it this June at the Manhattan Film Festival.

Filed under: Food, Living

View full post on Grist

School Site Coordinator – Walking School Bus

September 27th, 2012 admin No comments

Ecology Action.
CA – California, Santa Cruz
Location: Santa Cruz, CA Salary Range: $20.00 per hour Exempt/Non-Exempt: Non-Exempt Benefits: There are no benefits, this is a temporary position Employment Type: Part Time Description: BackgroundEcology Action is an…

Salary: $20.00 per hour. Date posted: 09/27/2012

View full post on Great Green Careers RSS Feed

Categories: Green Jobs Tags: , , ,

No more trowels, no more roots: What happens to school gardens in summer?

August 1st, 2012 admin No comments

One of Katy Brantley’s summer garden interns hard at work.

The biggest irony of the school garden is that it often goes untended during summer, the peak season. This is no coincidence; what we now call “summer vacation” used to be the time when most parents needed their children at home in the fields, planting and harvesting.

Now that the majority of Americans are no longer farmers, however, schools have become many children’s sole exposure to agriculture. But the good news is that they’re far from scarce; schools across the country are scrambling to set up food-producing gardens and take advantage of the hands-on lessons they provide.

Alice Waters’ “edible schoolyard,” while no longer considered revolutionary, is still a model for many teachers. Food Corps, a branch of the AmeriCorps Service Network dedicated to food education, is wrapping up its first year of garden programming in selected schools, and many school districts and nonprofits are embracing school gardens at the local level. But what happens to all these gardens when school’s out for summer?

“There are kinks that haven’t been worked out in a lot of these newer school gardens, summer maintenance being one of them,” said Dana Stevens, a Food Corps member stationed in rural Washington County, Maine. When she arrived, the crop of brand-new school gardens in the area was mostly either left untended June through August or maintained by faculty or community volunteers.

This year, Stevens tried to organize the process. At one of the schools where she’d worked during the year, she created a garden work party schedule for the summer, turning a volunteer chore into an opportunity for a community get-together every couple of weeks. At another school, Stevens ran a weekly summer garden program for second through sixth graders. Every Wednesday, her group of 13 did garden upkeep, played garden-related games, and finished the day by harvesting and cooking a meal together.

Katy Brantley, serving Food Corps in Monticello, Ark., took a similar approach with the garden at the middle school where she taught. At the end of the school year she put out applications for summer garden interns, and ended up with about 10 kids who would come a couple times a week to help maintain the garden and, like Stevens’ students, cook with fresh ingredients. She said many of these kids hadn’t actually taken garden classes during the school year, so the summer program served as a way to open the curriculum to everyone.

“I [found] some kids who are very dedicated and excited about coming to garden,” Brantley said. “It’s been much easier to keep it alive. It’s not beneficial for just me to be out there.”

Rachel Pringle, director of programs for the San Francisco Green Schoolyard Alliance, said that while the mild California climate means summer can serve as the dormant season for some gardens, “it’s also really wonderful to come back in the fall and have things ready to harvest.” To that end, many of the 80-plus gardens in the alliance have developed summer programming like cooking camps or internships. Schools with heavy parent involvement can rely on families to volunteer for a summer garden maintenance schedule, and in a city with epically long waiting lists for plots at community gardens, such volunteer work has the added benefit of offering would-be gardeners an area of their own to grow things, if only for a limited amount of time. “There are parents actually interested in growing food for themselves over the summer,” Pringle said. “In an urban environment they didn’t have that [space] at home.”

Of course, some volunteers inevitably neglect their garden-work duties. But, Pringle said, “the wonderful thing is that school gardening is an experiment. It’s fun, it’s wild — they’re not perfectly manicured gardens.” And a slightly overgrown plot offers a great opportunity for kids to jump right in and get their hands dirty cleaning it up at the beginning of the school year.

Beyond the practical benefit, summer programs can also be an ideal setting for garden education. Stevens said having students for a full day gave her much more freedom to let lessons follow their natural course. “[It’s] not just a 40-minute classroom session where they’re in and out and may or may not remember what they did that day,” she said. “We can explore what’s actually happening in the garden and what people are interested in.”

Both Stevens and Brantley said having more time to cook in the summer also made a key difference. “It’s really important to have both pieces — working in the garden and learning to use what’s coming out of it,” Stevens said. “When I go into schools to do classes we have to choose one or the other.”

Students can forget a lot of what they learn over summer break — including food and garden lessons. That’s why, Pringle said, “creating an outdoor classroom culture at your school” is a critical part of turning kids into gardeners. “If you have a summer program, that is just reinforcement of all those skills and the culture they’ve been learning throughout the year.”

Though Stevens and Brantley are now wrapping up their yearlong Food Corps commitments, they’re leaving their schools’ gardens in good shape for the next crop of volunteers to expand their efforts. After all, as Pringle put it, “school gardens should never be finished.”

Filed under: Article, Food

View full post on Grist

New Orleans school cultivates a generation of forward-thinking farmers

April 9th, 2012 admin No comments

our_school_blair_grocery

By Claire Thompson

Nat Turner (third from left, white shirt) stands on a new compost pile with a group of OSBG interns, Americorps employees, and volunteers.

Nat Turner, a former New York City public-school teacher, moved to New Orleans’ Lower Ninth Ward on Thanksgiving Day, 2008. He didn’t know anything about gardening — “I could barely keep a cactus alive” — but he had a vision to start an urban farm that would be a vehicle for educating and empowering the neighborhood’s youth. He’d been making service trips to the Big Easy with students, but he wanted an opportunity to dig deeper, literally and figuratively, into the city’s revitalization.

His first goal, Turner says, “is to figure out how to make the Lower Ninth food secure.” It seems fitting, then, that in a neighborhood with no supermarket, Turner set up shop in a falling-down building that had once housed a black-owned family business called the B&G Grocery. He filled a pink bathtub in the backyard with soil and planted scallions, which floated away when the bathtub flooded in a rainstorm. That was the beginning of Our School at Blair Grocery (OSBG).

The school’s ramshackle appearance makes it look at home in the Lower Ninth, where wild plants and animals now battle residents for control of the land. I visited the school in March, and it was my second time in New Orleans. The first had been in December 2006, and my shock then at how little the hardest-hit neighborhoods had recovered since Katrina seems naïve to me now, given the fact that abandoned houses and empty lots still dominate the landscape more than five years later.

But people live in the Lower Ninth again, and that fact alone has made it less of a ghost town. Turner waves to neighbors as we drive toward the school, and I eye the sky full of thunderclouds and wonder what it felt like to watch Katrina roll in from this same spot.

After more than three years and a lot of grueling work (including picking all the glass and debris from the yard by hand so it could be planted), OSBG has become much more than a pink bathtub full of soil. Its rows of tomato plants, arugula, basil, and pole beans, framed by a background of weedy lots and some still-empty houses, present a powerful symbol of renewal. Turner and a handful of staff and interns (transplants, local teens, and three ex-offenders employed through Americorps’ Cornerstone Ministries program), as well as rotating volunteer crews, grow enough produce to sell to 10 local restaurants and the New Orleans Food Co-op. They have chickens, hoop houses, and beehives.

Turner met the urban farming pioneer and founder of Growing Power, Will Allen, in 2009, and the farm is now a Regional Outreach Training Center for the Milwaukee-based organization. Last summer, OSBG hosted a “food security academy” with around 40 kids from the neighborhood and the city’s summer youth employment program. In addition to discussing the intersections of food security, social justice, and civil rights, they calculated that it would take 1,100 tomato plants to feed the Lower Ninth Ward.

The garden has now expanded to empty lots across the street from the original site.

The garden has already expanded to the empty lot across the street, and soon the lot adjacent to that one will be planted, too. But Turner will need a lot more land, manpower, and money to scale up to the point where OSBG can indeed feed the Lower Ninth. In the meantime, the question of how to get there has often sparked controversy. Last year, he said, he fired his whole staff after internal conflict over the direction of the project reached a breaking point. Now, he’s up-front about the fact that a project like his, however noble its intentions, must become commercially viable in order to make a lasting impact.

“[This is] not gardening for fun,” Turner says. “This is urban farming.”

Gardening suggests a hobby; farming a vocation. The OSBG crew sees New Orleans struggling to move beyond the hobby phase. “There’s a lot of excitement and people having a lot of meetings and a lot of ideas,” says Sam Turner, 18, a former student of Nat Turner’s (no relation) in New York who now works at the farm. “Community gardening is great, but it’s not food justice. It’s not creating jobs.”

For an urban farm to provide food security for a neighborhood like the Lower Ninth, it has to make a profit and produce food that the community will actually eat. “Our challenge was to grow vegetables the neighbors want,” Turner explains. “Black people don’t want to eat portobello mushrooms.”

Okra, on the other hand, is a local favorite, as is mirliton. Knowing the pace at which bureaucracy moves in New Orleans, Turner is already planting up neighboring abandoned lots while waiting for the city’s approval.

“There’s nobody in Louisiana who, if they came back, would be mad if there was okra growing on their property,” he says, confidently.

Turner has garnered national attention for his approach, which combines outside-the-mainstream education with food justice work, setting OSBG apart from other more run-of-the-mill urban farming projects popping up around the Lower Ninth. As we drive past one, he points out its locked gate. There’s no gate at Blair Grocery, even though Turner says they have problems with theft. He caught one of his own employees stealing a movie projector -– a frustrating experience, to say the least, but certainly not the only one Turner’s had on the way to realizing his vision. I get the sense that, when it comes to living and working in the Lower Ninth, you have to pick your battles. Turner lets his neighbors siphon power from the school when they don’t pay their electrical bill. He turns a blind eye when the woman across the way, a friend and supporter of the project, helps herself to extra produce. He knows some of the kids who work at OSBG get up to no good in their off hours. He talks matter-of-factly about the crime, drugs, and poverty entrenched in the neighborhood, in the midst of which his urban farm and “sustainability education center” stand out as something of an oddity.

“Nobody under 50 really sees any value in any of the shit we’re doing,” he says. “Except teenagers. They’re impressionable.”

OSBG composts food scraps from several New Orleans businesses (including Whole Foods) to make their soil.

So Turner focuses on cultivating a new generation who see growing food as normal, essential, even cool. Allen Lefort, an 18-year-old from the neighborhood, is part of that. Whether or not he’ll graduate high school remains to be seen, but he works at the school just about every day, helping out with the garden and spending a lot of time on art projects: murals, paintings, and an effort to spruce up the one indoor classroom with a more colorful paint job. He got involved with the school about eight months ago, through a friend.

“I thought it was strange at first,” Lefort admits. If you’d told him last year that he’d be working at the farm, he says, “I would have been like, ‘You got me mixed up with someone else. That ain’t no job!’”

The day I was there, Lefort lingered past the time for him to go home, giving Jamie Katz, one of the full-time staff, a haircut, and eventually heading out with a pot of jambalaya to take home to his family.

“Because of the responsibilities they give you to do on the farm, I think my thoughts be maturing,” he says. “I ain’t got nothing to do, so I might as well do something that’ll help my future.”

While urban gardening is an eye-opening experience for Lefort and Our School’s other young farmers, their future-minded work carries on a tradition familiar to older generations in the Lower Ninth. “The young people we work with have never grown food, but people have been growing food in this neighborhood for a long time,” Katz said. “It’s not new. What’s new is seeing the potential in it.”

Filed under: Food, Sustainable Farming, Urban Agriculture

View full post on Grist

‘Cafeteria Man’ comes out swinging for better school lunches

March 8th, 2012 admin No comments

Tony

By Claire Thompson

Tony Geraci.

School districts across the country are finding out that improving cafeteria food is never as simple as planting a garden. The bigger and poorer the district, the longer it takes to get anything done, and even smaller, well-funded districts struggle to make real change. That’s why, when Baltimore City Public Schools hired a new director of food and nutrition in 2008, food advocates watched eagerly to see how reform would play out there. Even Michael Pollan was quoted saying, “If Baltimore can pull this off, it will be a sign that the effort is worth making.”

Tony Geraci, Baltimore’s new “cafeteria man,” had his work cut out for him, and the gung-ho way he dove into the job caused no small amount of controversy in this city of 82,000 public-school students. When he stepped down from his position two years later, Geraci was accused of failing to live up to expectations, while he and his supporters blamed the slow progress on school-system bureaucracy.

Cafeteria Man, a documentary from Baltimore cinematographer Richard Chisholm, is a whirlwind look at Geraci’s tenure with the city’s schools. The film shows us snippets of the many ambitious projects the Cafeteria Man took on — from “breakfast boxes” that mask nutritious food with Happy Meal-like packaging, to class tours and student apprenticeships at a local farm, to Geraci’s frustrated attempt to find funding for a central kitchen. The chaos of working within a large public school district like Baltimore’s certainly comes clear, and a scene of horrified high schoolers tasting raw oysters for the first time illustrates the disconnect so many of the students have from real food. But seeing first graders at the farm munching with fascination on clover and radishes shows how this kind of hands-on approach can begin to bridge that divide — maybe just at a slower pace than eager advocates would prefer.

We caught up with Chisholm to talk more about Geraci, his legacy, and the challenges of achieving such ambitious reform.

A still from the film.

Q. Why did you want to make a film about Tony Geraci’s efforts in Baltimore?

A. I’m not a foodie by trade. I am a parent. What attracted me most was more the issue of how to make social change in America in institutions that are stagnant and bureaucratic and deadlocked, and school food to me was a great petri dish. Obama had just come to the White House at the same time Tony had come to Baltimore. The same thing happened to Tony that happened to Obama. He was brought in as sort of a messiah. Six months or a year later people say, “Why haven’t you fixed it?” I was much more interested in the portrait of a change agent than I was [in] calories and nutrition and obesity.

Q. Since you weren’t immersed in food issues before making this film, what surprised you the most about school food?

A. The way the food looked and tasted and smelled didn’t surprise me as much as the level of corruption and lethargy and cronyism that was governing the system. I didn’t know how this collusion between government and corporations was playing out for cafeteria food in schools in America. That was shocking to me, this system of bad food being profited on.

Q. After following Geraci’s efforts at school-food reform, what do you think it takes to make this kind of change? What can other cities learn from Baltimore?

A. We did not want to make a film [that was] one-size-fits-all. Baltimore in particular is a very difficult environment to make change in because it’s an undercapitalized city. There’s a lot of poverty, a lot of institutional lethargy.

I’m now convinced of the value of a visionary leader who is unafraid to audaciously challenge things that are wrong, and the value of that person to have contagious optimism so that people he’s talking to don’t feel threatened or bad about what they’re doing, but feel invited to participate in something wonderful. I’m cynical and jaded about my city of Baltimore, and I was intoxicated with [Geraci’s] optimism. I was driving down the road looking at drug corners in Tony’s car, and Tony says, “See those kids over there? Imagine them working in a restaurant.”

The cafeteria system was run into the ground slowly. Right after [World War II] it was great, they had silverware and people were cooking in every school in the country. It was fresh and fairly local and smelled good and tasted good. It took 50 years to fuck up school food — why would it take two years or five years to fix it? It’s going to take a long time and a lot of money and a lot of creative thinking to make it work.

Q. What about kids’ tastes? That seemed to be a problem in Baltimore, where kids, parents, and especially the meat industry were upset about the vegetarian food served on Meatless Mondays (“You wouldn’t believe the number of calls I get from parents on Mondays who are angry because their kids can’t get a chicken box,” Geraci told Baltimore’s Urbanite magazine.) Even if you can get healthy, fresh food into schools, will kids eat it?

A. The fast food companies have been working for decades with science to find out the fats and sugars and salts that our brain chemistry is evolutionarily wired for. It’s irresistible, because they know exactly what works and what doesn’t. Most of us are addicted to bad food.

What we tried to do in the film is symbolize [that] with the little first graders, taking them to the farm and having them taste fresh food for the first time. It animated their experience with food. Even if they’re still eating at McDonald’s they at least got exposure.

The other thing you do with kids is tell them how we’re being fucked over by corporations. If you go to a fast food place, you’re giving money to the wrong man. There’s this other place down the street called a farmers market. These people care about you.

Q. What’s the status of Baltimore school food today? What do you think of criticisms that Geraci’s efforts failed?

A. The [school] farm didn’t exist at all [before he arrived]; he invented that. Now it’s got a teaching kitchen, and there are constant rotating field trips, more arable land, worm space, mulch space, constant training for city kids. Most of the food is locally sourced now. The after-school supper [program], which was a pilot in the film — now there’s 20 or 30 schools doing it. Those kids now have a second meal, and their parents can come and have it for $2 or $3. There are things like the central kitchen that are still caught up in bureaucracy, but they are being dealt with, just in slow motion. Some of the things he succeeded in are invisible — people aren’t jumping up and down [because] the procurement contracts are less corrupt.

There are people who resented the hell out of Tony because they were happy signing two documents and not doing anything else in a day. He came along and said, “OK, now we have to work harder.”

Watch the trailer:



Filed under: Article, Food

View full post on Grist

Dirty South: Youth farms keep New Orleans teens in school gardens

December 18th, 2011 admin No comments

by Tracie McMillan.

Smack in the middle of a half-dozen shipping containers and
striding up a mound of gravel, Johanna Gilligan, 31, can’t contain her
excitement. “This looks so awesome!” She nods her head at an alcove
between two containers, painted the pale color of new celery, with dry sinks
attached. “That’s going to be for processing.”

Gilligan, co-director of New Orleans’ Grow Dat Youth Farm, traipses up the mound, which terminates at a
deck of sorts and more containers, crowded with architectural students from
Tulane University and local urban farm experts. Beyond the deck sits a bayou,
lined with trees weeping Spanish moss into the water; the I-610 freeway buzzes
along in the background. “I can’t believe how much is done! My office is
going to be in a treehouse!”

She has reason to be excited. At four acres, the buildings’
site is just a sliver of City Park, 1,300 acres of green space on New Orleans’
north side. But come February, the buildings will be done, the beds will be
ready for planting, and the second class of Grow Dat farmers will commence
their work. The goal: one acre planted, 10,000 pounds of food grown, 20 jobs
for student workers.

Pitched as the natural progression of programs like Alice
Waters’ Edible Schoolyard (New Orleans is home to the first Edible Schoolyard affiliate outside
of the Bay Area, and its founding director, Donna Cavato, sits on Grow Dat’s
board), Grow Dat will welcome its second round of student workers in February.
The project was founded in 2010 with the Tulane City Center, a
community design and architecture initiative, and the Urban Innovator Challenge
Fellowship
, also at Tulane. The backing let Gilligan, a founding staffer for the
New Orleans Food and Farm Network and a driving force behind Rethink’s New Orleans School Food Report Card, bring in a small staff to work out kinks for the program’s first year. In its
inaugural year, Grow Dat employed 13 student workers who grew a total of 2,200
pounds of food, donating nearly two-thirds of it to food banks, and selling the
rest at a farmers market.

The effort, says Denise Richter, who coordinates gardens at
five elementary and middle schools for Edible Schoolyard New Orleans (ESY-NOLA), solves a
riddle that’s confounded ESY-NOLA since it was founded: how to keep students
engaged with food after eighth grade.

“There was always this moment where it was like,
‘Great, we’ve been able to establish a culture and an understanding of how
important it is to know where your food comes from and cook it,’” says
Richter, who says ESY-NOLA works with more than 500 students each year.
“And there’s always this regret, because what do they do [after ESY]? Go
to a place where their cafeteria food looks like it did five years ago, eating
slop. Grow Dat is such an asset, because our students can apply their skills
and go even further.”

With an older — if much smaller — pool of students, Grow Dat is
aiming to expand teenagers’ food knowledge while teaching even broader lessons
about work and collaboration. “A key concept of Grow Dat is that you
cannot do social change only in one neighborhood,” says Gilligan. She sees
the program’s site at City Park as neutral ground for students, who this year
will come from a mix of public and private schools, to learn “to
communicate across race and class lines.”

That’s a heady goal, but if Aston Shields, 17, is any
indication, Grow Dat may have some luck in meeting it. One of last year’s
students — he’s angling to return as a crew leader this year — Shields didn’t start
out interested in food. “I was just reading posters on the wall, and
stumbled onto [the job listing],” says Shields in an urban drawl, adding
that he mostly applied because it was a paid job. For a modest stipend, he
learned how to plan and maintain food gardens, wash and prepare vegetables for
market and track their sales, and even attended a handful of lectures on food
systems at Tulane. “I came here and I was like, ‘Wow, I never even really
thought about how people produced our food,’” says Shields. “It was
just a whole new world.”

But in addition to being paid for his work, Shields was able
to take home fruits and vegetables from plots he was helping tend at the
Hollygrove Market and Farm — a
special boon to a family living in the Hollygrove neighborhood where, says
Shields, the closest thing to a supermarket is a Walgreen’s. “Once Grow
Dat gave me fruits and vegetables, [my family] embraced it,” says
Shields — even if the end results weren’t exactly what most slow food acolytes
might have had in mind. “We had some shiitake mushrooms,” says
Shields. “And my momma made sloppy joes with it.”

Related Links:

Sea change: Asian Americans and seafood in the gulf [Part 2]

Public school’s rooftop greenhouse teaches kids about food

Food Studies: Talking about race in school gardens






View full post on Grist.org – the latest from Grist

A dollar badly spent: New facts on processed food in school lunches

December 16th, 2011 admin No comments

by Tom Laskawy.

I want to draw
attention to an eye-opening investigative report on school lunch that has gotten a
bit lost in the holiday shuffle. In a collaboration between The
New York Times
and the Investigative Fund, reporter Lucy Komisar delved into the billion-dollar business of the national school lunch program
and found some unsettling news.

Komisar looked at
two less-examined aspects of the school lunch program. The first is the
practice of taking up to $1 billion of “surplus” fruits, vegetables,
and meats that the USDA supplies to the program and, rather than cooking them
into healthy meals, turning them into high-fat processed foods. The second is
the surprisingly inefficient economics of outsourcing cafeteria services to
private companies like Sodexo or Aramark.

As for the first practice, about $1 billion of surplus
foods like apples, potatoes, and chicken are transferred from the USDA to
schools for free every year. Only most schools don’t prepare the foods in their
own kitchens—they pay processing companies, as Komisar says, “to turn these
healthy ingredients into fried chicken nuggets, fruit pastries, pizza, and the
like.”

And, of course,
french fries.

Schools across the
country have shut down their own kitchens in favor of facilities that can
reheat and serve these processed foods. The logic was supposed to be
irresistible—it combined the efficiencies of centralized food production with the simplicity of easily trained workers.   

However, as Komisar
observes, turning chicken into chicken nuggets isn’t all that cheap:

The
Michigan Department of Education, for example, gets free raw chicken worth
$11.40 a case and sends it for processing into nuggets at $33.45 a case. The
schools in San Bernardino, Calif., spend $14.75 to make French fries out of
$5.95 worth of potatoes.

… Roland
Zullo, a researcher at the University of Michigan, found in 2008 that Michigan
schools that hired private food-service management firms spent less on labor
and food but more on fees and supplies, yielding “no substantive economic
savings.”

Komisar also quotes
another study by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation which determined that this practice transformed perfectly good ingredients into
foods that “have about the same nutritional value as junk foods.”

As one principal
Komisar spoke to put it, in the wake of her district switching to management
company Sodexo, “the savings were paltry … You pay a little less and your kids
get strawberry milk, frozen French fries, and artificial shortening.” Every day.

But what really
gets me about all of this isn’t just the fact that we’re willingly shelling out
serious money to turn healthy ingredients into junk, but that we’re also taking
good jobs out of communities that need them:

School
kitchen workers are generally unionized, with benefits; they are also typically
local residents who have children in public schools and care about their
well-being. Laid-off school workers become an economic drain instead of a
positive force. And the rebate deals with national food manufacturers cut out
local farmers and small producers like bakers, who could offer fresh, healthy
food and help the local economy.

Talk about a
double whammy. And this being corporate America, there’s a healthy dose of
corruption to go along with it. Last year, private cafeteria companies were caught paying illegal rebates to food processors—rebates that weren’t passed on to the school districts. As then-New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo stated in a comment on a $20 million fine
paid by Sodexo in New York for the practice, “This company cut sweetheart deals
with suppliers and then denied taxpayer-supported schools the benefits.”

Shockingly, Komisar
has discovered that these illegal rebates have crept back in the form of
“prompt payment discounts”—a form of kickback that is, under USDA rules,
legal.

Is it any wonder
that Congress has fought the USDA’s attempt to reform school lunch in the form
of the much-mocked and maligned Defense of Pizza and Potato Acts? It would be funny if not for the
fact that so much money is riding on these ridiculous laws.

This battle by
corporations and Congress to keep our schoolkids eating junk food comes
even as the scientific evidence piles up that school is the best place to battle
obesity—both through increased exercise and healthier food. In fact, this study out of Australia, published in Cochrane
Library, indicates that school-based programs that try to
increase activity levels among kids aged 6-12 may actually reduce obesity—which is impressive since research suggests that exercise-based interventions
are not particularly effective in other age groups. And the study goes on to observe that the
U.S. lags behind most other countries in adoption of such school-based interventions.
Apparently, we do crony capitalism really well, and that’s about it.

There are some
amazing school lunch reforms going on, thanks to movers and shakers like Ann Cooper and organizations like Food Corps. But Komisar’s article reminds us
that when billions of dollars are sloshing around the system, even the best
reforms can seem like small potatoes.

Related Series

Cafeteria confidential: Behind the scenes in school kitchens

Related Links:

Livestock handouts in Africa: More complex than you’d think

Sorry Mrs. O, but jumping jacks aren’t enough

Whippersnappers unite: Young farmers work to change 2012 Farm Bill






View full post on Grist.org – the latest from Grist

The unmasking of a school lunch hero: Mrs. Q speaks

October 14th, 2011 admin No comments

by Claire Thompson.

Some of you may already know of Mrs. Q, the teacher who blogged anonymously about her adventures eating
lunch in the cafeteria of the public school where she worked every day in 2010.
Her daily posts included pictures of
each day’s meal (pizza, chicken nuggets, pasta with meat sauce, etc.) and brief
descriptions of how they tasted and made her feel. This simple formula gained Mrs.
Q a huge following of teachers, parents, students, and citizens interested in
changing the food system (improving school lunch, many reformers say, could be
a step toward combating childhood obesity).

Now that her book, Fed Up with Lunch, has been
released, the world can finally know Mrs. Q. as Sarah Wu, a speech pathologist
working in Chicago Public Schools (CPS) whose first career, in a weirdly ironic
twist, was at Kraft Foods (“I knew that it was not right for me at all,” she
said).

Wu’s unlikely rise to food-movement stardom (she’s been featured on The View and Good Morning America) began when she
simply forgot her lunch one day and ended up buying one from the school
cafeteria. Wu still works for CPS, although she has voluntarily transferred
from the school where she ate for a year (for “self-preservation”). Just in time to wrap up National School Lunch Week, we recently
had a chance to chat with her about what this project means, for her and for
school food everywhere.

Q. How did you decide to
commit to this challenge, and why did you take this anonymous,
Morgan Spurlock-esque
immersion approach?

A. At that point [the beginning of 2010], I had worked for CPS
for three years. I’d noticed the food, but I think at the time I was just
concerned about doing a great job as a speech therapist. I had a little boy who
was just turning one, and starting to eat real food at home, and I was really
starting to consider, well, what is it that I’m putting on the table? I had
always figured that I was a healthy cook; we didn’t eat fast food. I would never let my son eat what they served
me that day, and I was just heartbroken that my students were going home to
potentially not very good food, and a lot of them live in poverty—it was
pretty disheartening to see that.

I think I ended up making more of a dent by doing what I
did, instead of trying to do advocacy at the local level. My objective was to
put those lunches out there because I was affected by them. But I didn’t want
to be the kind of person [who is] labeled as a rabble-rouser. I’m not like
that.

Q. For people who may
have already followed your blog, what more does the book offer?

A. As an anonymous blogger, there’s tons that I wasn’t able to
say. I didn’t tell anyone that I’d worked at Kraft, which I think adds an
interesting dimension. I didn’t tell anybody what the school district was; I
didn’t get into a lot of detail, even though I blogged every day. So the book
really is a journey; it’s the story of me going along my little way, and
everything that I learned about the food system, and ingredients, and health and
wellness topics in general. I talk about recess, because the school I was at
last year had no recess. People in power making stupid choices on behalf of
kids, that’s really the problem.

Q. What’s been the most
surprising thing throughout this whole experience?

A. What’s been the most surprising is the reception from my
coworkers. They want to talk to me about these issues. For example, a coworker
of mine came up to me and said, “I’m so proud of you, the food they’re feeding
the kids is crap and we need to change it.” He would never have started that
conversation with me [before]. That’s
been most surprising, that people were not angry about what I did. I felt a lot
of inner turmoil, because I was struggling with the fact that I want to be a
great speech pathologist, I want to be a good employee, I take pride in my
work, and I didn’t want to jeopardize that. And I didn’t want to be labeled as
this bitch. So I totally miscalculated their response.

Q. For parents who are
aware of or concerned about their kids’ school lunches, but aren’t sure where
to start in terms of making changes, what’s your advice?

A. I’ve changed my son’s daycare food slightly by just asking
the right questions. It’s either parent-teacher night, or report card pickup
day (which is what they do in Chicago Public Schools)—that’s when you want to
ask those questions. Explore the school—find the lunchroom manager, find the
gym teacher, and people who are invested in health and wellness. Chat them up, start asking those questions, talk to the
principal, and be nice about it. [Kindness] goes a lot farther than if you come
down hard.

Q. Have your blog and
book had any effect on Chicago Public Schools?

A. CPS issued a statement last week saying they are adhering to
USDA standards and they have been improving. And they’re right—I [ate school
lunch] for a calendar year, January to December, so I saw two different school
years. There was improvement; there were more fresh veggies and fruit. I don’t
want to take credit for it because everyone’s thinking about this right now.
It’s amazing.

Q. So how did eating
this food every day make you feel? Did it have any effect on your health?

A. I started eating school lunches and it just completely
wreaked havoc on my body. I was so grateful to have summer break for
recuperation. In June I went to the doctor and got diagnosed with mild asthma,
which was odd, and I got a prescription for an inhaler. But I also lost 20
points on my cholesterol, and I think it’s because [I was] eating better than
I’ve ever eaten in my life outside of school lunch.

I had suffered from irritable bowel syndrome for many years,
and I felt like I sort of had it under control, so I didn’t really think about
the fact that if you eat school lunch it’s going to aggravate everything. I
thought, it’s just food, and I think that’s how a lot of parents think—who
cares, it’s no big deal. But really what I learned is: Food is everything! It’s
our whole life.

Q. You seem to have
gained a particular affection for school lunch ladies (or men, as the case may
be). What’s that about?

A. The person who feeds you creates a
relationship with you, you know? It’s not just a transaction, it’s that human
contact. When I feed my son, it’s not just putting food in front of him,
there’s love involved, and that’s exactly what happens with lunch ladies. It’s
not easy working in the lunchroom—it’s hot, you burn yourself all the time,
they’re tired, but they’re there for the kids. Lots of times lunch ladies have
other roles in the school. The lunch lady at [the school where I ate for a
year] mentored some of the difficult children who were having tough times
behaviorally. She reached out to them. That’s something I don’t think people
realize.

Q. So now that your book
is out, after the publicity dies down, what’s next?

A. Oh my gosh. I don’t have a clue. I just enjoy my work. I
guess I’m open to possibilities. I didn’t do this because I hated my job, I did
this because I love my job. So if everything’s the same, that’s okay.

Related Links:

Food Studies: Canvolution!

Peebottle Farms: Have eggs, will barter

Chow-to: Stop worrying and love your kitchen timer






View full post on Grist.org – the latest from Grist

Down with healthy school lunches, says House GOP

June 1st, 2011 admin No comments

by Tom Laskawy.

Having already moved to gut USDA programs promoting agricultural conservation and renewable energy and strip the USDA of its authority to enact the first meaningful reform of the irredeemably monopolistic livestock industry, House Republicans have now turned their attention to that other great threat to American freedom: USDA nutrition guidelines.

According to the Associated Press, Republican appropriators in the House of Representatives (the lawmakers who control the government’s purse) are on the verge of defunding significant parts of school-lunch reform and elements of Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move! program, as well as the recently announced voluntary Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines that would restrict junk-food advertising aimed at young children.

As a spokesperson for House Appropriations Committee Chair Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) put it, the new FTC rule in particular is “classic nanny-state overreach”:

“Our concern is those voluntary guidelines are back-door regulation,” he said, deploring the fact that kids can watch shows that depict sex and drugs on MTV, but “you cannot see an advertisement for Tony the Tiger during the commercial break.”

Ah, the House GOP—making the world safe for Tony the Tiger. But the fury of the Cuddly Corporate Marketing Character Lobby pales in comparison to that of the Potato Lobby. Big Spud is furious—furious, I tell you—that the new USDA guidelines for school lunches would restrict starchy vegetables such as the potato to a one-cup-a-week appearance on the plates of schoolchildren nationwide. In place of the mighty potato would come additional servings of whole grains, orange and green veggies, and low-fat milk. It’s enough to drive you around the bend!

Never mind that the potato is by far the most-consumed vegetable in America and that restricting it at school would still allow parents to stuff their children with French-fried, mashed, and chipped potatoes outside of school hours. Attention must be paid! So the Potato Lobby and representatives from potato-growing regions are fighting back hard.

And how about the new calorie-labeling requirement that was included in health-reform legislation? The House GOP is going after that, too.

While snark seems the only reasonable response to such utter fecklessness from our elected representatives, the fact is that the situation is deadly serious:

The overall spending bill would cut billions from USDA and FDA budgets, including for domestic feeding programs and international food aid. Even after some of the money was restored Tuesday, the bill would still cut about $650 million—or 10 percent—from the Women, Infants and Children program that feeds and educates mothers and their children. It would cut almost 12 percent of the Food and Drug Administration’s $2.5 billion budget, straining the agency’s efforts to implement a new food safety law signed by the president early this year.

Indeed, this is no laughing matter. On the one hand, this is just the House, which, in the iron grip of the Tea Party, is spitting out one destructive piece of legislation after another. The Democrat-controlled Senate will have no interest in much of what the House disgorges. But the two houses of Congress must ultimately agree on spending legislation. The question is how the houses can meaningfully meet when one side has gone so far afield.

Related Links:

Why wasting food wastes nature, too

Mom-and-pop vs. big-box stores in the food desert

You want superbugs with that?






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Incoming search terms for the article:

Students fight to save innovative garden-based public school in Detroit

April 26th, 2011 admin No comments

by Tom Philpott.

When
I visited Detroit last summer, I found it to be a place of extremes. On
the one hand, a city buckling under the weight of decades of
deindustrialization, white flight, and abandonment—a city so gripped
by economic malaise that it contained not even a single full-service
supermarket. On the other, it also seemed a a veritable beehive of
community organizing, based mainly around urban agriculture.

It’s
not hard to see why the city’s community leaders have settled on urban
ag. It takes two devastating problems—a surfeit of abandoned land, a
lack of grocery stores—and turns them into, respectively, a resource
and an opportunity. Abundant land can be used to grow high-quality fresh
food, which which will then find a ready market among a citizenry that
relies heavily on liquor stores for food shopping. I wrote up my
impressions of Detroit in a broad overview and in a brief look at three especially interesting projects.

One
project I visited briefly but didn’t get a chance to write about was
Catharine Ferguson Academy, a special public high school for pregnant
girls. The school, featured in the documentary Grown in Detroit, is most famous for its large vegetable garden tended and harvested by
the students. But its importance goes beyond gardening. Teenage
pregnancy can be a tragic event—it can severely limit educational and
job opportunities for young women and lead to cycles of poverty and despair. The threat is particularly serious in a place like Detroit,
where job opportunities are limited.

Here’s how the school describes itself:

At
Ferguson, the main goals are to educate the young mothers and prepare
them for a good future. “We want our girls to know that becoming a
mother in your teens does not mean you are doomed to a dead end life,”
said Ms. Andrews.  All students are schooled in the core curriculum of
English, math, science, and social studies in a family-like, accepting
environment. Along with the academics, there is ‘real life’ learning
about raising a child and how to function as a knowledgeable,
independent, and productive adult. “The responsibility of providing food,
shelter, and other basic needs in life should not be stressful. They
have the right to look forward to a rewarding life and we help them
achieve it,” said Ms. Durant.

By
all accounts, it has been successful at achieving those goals. Its
graduation rate is 90 percent—well above the citywide average—and
more than half of graduates go on to two- or four-year colleges. And
yes, gardening is a major part of the curriculum. The school’s grounds
include “goats, chickens, vegetable gardens, a horse, beehives, and more,
where the ‘city girls’ have taken to the farm like they’ve always lived
there.”

Now,
in a rational society with an interest in solving its festering
problems, the Catharine Ferguson approach would be supported. There
might even be attempts to replicate it for other at-risk youth. In Great
Recession America, where government budget deficits have been ludicrously
fingered as Public Enemy Number One, the response is to threaten to
defund it and shut it down.

This
Rachel Maddow show segment has the goods on the vicious, antidemocratic politics
that led to the insane decision to put the Catharine Ferguson on the
chopping block:

As for the young women who attend the academy, they are not responding passively to the attack. They organized a sit-in last week to protest the shut-down threat. In response, a city that can’t keep its schools running nevertheless managed to send a team of cops out to menace and
arrest the girls. From Voice of Detroit, here is the account of Catharine Ferguson student Ashley Matthews, who participated in the protest:

When we heard the police were coming, we ran to the library as fast as we could and barricaded ourselves in there. The police knocked on the window, and before we knew it, they busted open the library door. We all got in a line and held hands. We took a vote because we wanted to be
democratic and we decided not to leave. We chose to stick together, we came together and we were staying together. We were chanting, ‘Whose schools? Our schools!’ The whole time I was recording everything on my phone.

The cops apparently didn’t appreciate the spectacle of nonviolent civic activism from a population segment—teenagers—often associated with apathy. Reports Voice of Detroit:

She [Matthews] said the cop who arrested her, a Detroit police officer named R. Brown, saw that she was recording the events and snatched the phone away. She said Detroit Public Schools officers also took part in the attacks.

“I had sat down, and he yanked me up and slammed me down on my stomach on the floor,” Matthews said. “All the girls went berserk, telling him to get off me, but he was just wiping up the floor with me. He pressed his thumbs in my neck, and he tightened the handcuffs so hard that I have
bruises there. I cried at first but then I made myself stop.”

Images of pregnant girls being roughed up by cops and hauled away in chains for defending their public school all too neatly sum up the dysfunctions of our age. Ashley Matthews and her classmates remind us that something real and important is at stake in the Kabuki theater over deficits playing out in Washington and at state capitals across the nation. We can have robust, democratically oriented public institutions that give everyone a fair shake; or we can eviscerate such institutions, leaving behind only thuggish police forces charged with quelling civic uprisings.

Meanwhile, while public schools get the budget ax, cheered on by “deficit hawks,” details are still dripping out about the full extent of public support for the very big banks that caused the financial crisis in the first place, as the latest revelations from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) show. Severe austerity backed by state violence for the schools; and what Sanders called “free money” for the banks. As the young women of Catharine Ferguson demonstrate, there’s no need to accept this situation docilely.

Defend Public Education and Change.org both have petitions in defense of the academy.

Related Links:

City funding will help school gardens take over NYC

Meet the woman leading the charge to green America’s schools

Solar could save Minnesota schools millions






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Incoming search terms for the article: