by Stephen Lacey.
Cross-posted from Climate Progress.
Canada was once seen as a progressive leader on environmental issues.
Today, the country is becoming an international pariah when it comes to
climate change — facing fierce criticism from environmental groups and world leaders over its decision to pull
out of the Kyoto Protocol and push dirty tar sands around the world.
It’s not just verbal criticism. The Europeans are currently
considering a law that would label the carbon content of tar-sands crude
in the E.U. as 22 percent higher than conventional crude. That would discourage
refiners, who have to meet 20 percent carbon reduction requirements by 2020,
from importing the fuel.
And back in the U.S., the fierce opposition to the proposed Keystone
XL pipeline rages on, spurring a strong movement within the country
against the resource.
Canadian officials are doing their best damage control, claiming that
the environmental footprint of digging up tar sands is getting smaller.
According to the Postmedia Network,
Canada’s Environment Minister Peter Kent claimed at the Durban climate
talks that tar sands are “a responsibly and sustainably developed
resource, of which we are proud.”
But internal government briefing documents released earlier this
month and reported on by Postmedia show a different kind of messaging
behind the scenes. In a background memo, sent to Canada’s Deputy
Environment Minister Paul Boothe, officials admitted the lack of
“credible information on [tar sands'] environmental performance.”
“Environment Canada also advised that the absence of scientific
evidence supporting their claims was affecting the industry’s ability
to raise capital from and sell into (the) foreign market,” reads the
memo.
PostMedia obtained the documents through a freedom of information request:
They also noted that the regulatory shortcomings have
left the industry ill-prepared to defend itself from foreign
environmental policies, such as proposed climate legislation in Europe
to reduce pollution from transportation fuels, as well as criticism on
the international stage at events such as the global warming summit in
this coastal resort town.
“National and international concern over the environmental footprint
of oil sands production represents a growing threat to the economic
future of the industry,” said the briefing material, sent on June 4 by
Assistant Deputy Minister Michael Keenan and released to Postmedia News
on Thursday evening through access to information legislation.
“Governments need to provide assurance that oil sands production is
environmentally responsible in order to secure the industry’s social
license to operate.”
The briefing also states that Canadian officials are “committed to
managing the environment in the oil sands based on science, not politics
or PR.”
Earlier this summer, however, Wikileaks released a 2009 diplomatic cable from the U.S. State Department to the Canadian government on how to
improve “oil sands messaging” and increase “visibility and accessibility
of more positive news stories.”
With the dust-up in the U.S. over the Keystone XL pipeline, the
threat over imports from the Europeans, and the overwhelming negative
reaction from groups concerned about climate change, the last year has
brought anything but positive news stories for the Canadians.
Perhaps that’s why Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is now focusing his attention on getting the product into China.
Related Links:
As Keystone XL victory looms, a ‘top enviro’ games out how to lose
Critical List: Funding for climate research drops; USDA approves drought-resistant corn
Republicans put a deadline on Keystone XL, surprising nobody
View full post on Grist.org – the latest from Grist
Canadian Green Scene Magazine & Directory/Edmonton, AB, Canada (nationwide)