Livestock handouts in Africa: More complex than you’d think
by Daisy Freund.
It’s the giving time of year again, and if you feel
like everyone in your life already has too much stuff, aid programs like Heifer International offer a feel-good alternative. From the comfort of your home you can donate a
farm animal to a family in the developing world, in a loved one’s name. These
programs operate on the theory that livestock is a sustainable handout,
providing milk, meat, fertilizer, and a potential income source.
It’s a worthy concept, but here in Rwanda, where I’ve been
living as an expat, it might be worth looking a gift cow in the mouth. The Rwandan
government is giving the most vulnerable families free Friesian cows as part of
a program called “One Cow Per Family.” And, considering that fact that well-fed
Friesians can produce three times more milk than the indigenous longhorn
Ankole-Watutsi breed, these cows can be lifesavers.
With chronic malnutrition rampant among Rwandan children, it
can seem hard to make a case for the Ankoles—but this might be the best time
to do so. Americans have only recently realized the importance of heritage animals (now that we’ve all but replaced most of them with high-producing
monocultures). And we’ve learned that efficiency always comes with a price,
namely: loss of biodiversity, cultural relevance, and flavor.
For Rwandans, the Ankole-Watutsi cows are often considered a
national icon. Those I spoke to lit up when describing the breed, using words
usually reserved for love sonnets. “The way you Americans like cars? We like
our cows,” one Rwandan explained wistfully. With their exaggerated curved
horns, chestnut coats, and noble humps, they are undeniably stunning. But for all their beauty, they’re simply not
efficient. As grazers, they take up much more space than their stationary,
grain- and hay-fed cousins. And, in a tiny, overpopulated country, there’s
pressure on the government to, ahem … milk every cow for all it’s worth. Government
policies favor intensification and make it difficult for pastoralists to
continue grazing their animals; all around the country farmers are trading in
their herds for the standard black and white variety.
Rwandans are still recovering from a recent, well-documented
genocide, in which 800,000 people were massacred, and the decision to confine
grazing animals touches a nerve for many there. Before colonization, before the
wars, Rwandans were divided into castes by wealth, which was defined by number
of cows. Tutsi were pastoralists with 10 or more head of cattle, Hutu were
agriculturalists with 10 or less. The lines were clear but crossable, and not
about ethnicity. A Hutu could become a Tutsi simply by acquiring a herd. But
colonists deepened the divisions, pitting one group against the other in a
divide-and-conquer tactic. Ninety percent of the national Ankole population was
wiped out during the genocide in an attempt to extinguish the Tutsi
cattle-rearing culture. Between wars, economic upheaval, and government-supported
crossbreeding, these cows have been steadily going the way of Milking Devons and Belted Galways. Unlike other livestock breeds, which have been
engineered into walking milk factories, Ankole cows are viewed as superfluous.
The reality, however, is that the Friesians are the fussy,
high-maintenance, and expensive cows to raise. And importing them into a country
like Rwanda is simply perpetuating the nature-be-damned ideology that has
cursed the developed world’s food systems. Friesians require enormous
quantities of feed, expensive antibiotics, and even purified water just to
survive in Rwanda, while the uniquely adapted Ankole can power through drought,
parasites, and downright scruffy roughage. Their horns actually circulate blood,
cooling it before it is returned to the body, which explains why they’re always
the last cows standing when temperatures climb. And if we know anything, it’s
that it’s not getting colder in Africa any time soon. So we may soon need Ankole
cows and their horns more than we care to admit.
What anyone who comes to Rwanda can tell you—if they’re
lucky enough to find and try it—is that Ankole milk is sweet, heavenly, and high
in butterfat. It is a triple-crème waiting to happen, and, as one of the 5,000 or
so cheese-deprived expats living in Rwanda, I can attest to the stable market
that would exist here for a Rwandan-style brie. The nation is pushing tourism,
and hotels are popping up around the capital city, Kigali, faster than they can be furnished. Those
hotels serve foreigners who want locally produced food. A small Rwandan cheese industry
would create jobs, and possibly an exportable product. The same goes for Ankole
meat that is low in cholesterol, lean, and tasty. And the meat from their humps
has a special fat with flavor characteristics similar to bacon. It’s a foodie’s
holy grail.
Rather than recklessly replacing their livestock, Rwanda and
other countries with indigenous livestock varieties would do well to lead the
rest of the world by actually working with what they have. This is not a new
concept. Projects like the Slow
Food Ark of Taste and Heritage
Foods USA rightly advocate for threatened breeds by encouraging us to eat
them. For Rwanda, there is an even bigger opportunity to change the paradigm,
create jobs, encourage cultural pride and tourism, and mitigate the threat of
climate change. Plus: bacon from a cow? The world needs to pay attention.
Related Links:
Sorry Mrs. O, but jumping jacks aren’t enough
Whippersnappers unite: Young farmers work to change 2012 Farm Bill
View full post on Grist.org – the latest from Grist