Working For Jobs

by Brad Johnson.

Cross-posted from ThinkProgress Green.

The climate denier blogosphere is going mad over a new paper that supposedly “should dramatically alter the global
warming debate” by showing that “far less heat is being trapped than
alarmist computer models have predicted.” The paper [PDF],
written by conservative climate scientist Roy Spencer and his
University of Alabama colleague William Braswell, finds that “satellite
observations and climate models display markedly different behaviors,”
and posits, with caveats, that there may be “lower climate sensitivity
of the real climate system.” As LiveScience’s Stephanie Pappas writes,
the paper then was promoted by a Heartland Institute blogger on the Forbes.com website:

The study, published July 26 in the open-access online journal Remote Sensing,
got public attention when a writer for The Heartland Institute, a
libertarian think-tank that promotes climate change skepticism, wrote
for Forbes magazine that the study disproved the global warming
worries of climate change “alarmists.” However, mainstream climate
scientists say that the argument advanced in the paper is neither new
nor correct.

Pappas interviewed climatologists Gavin Schmidt, Kevin Trenberth, and Andrew Dessler, who eviscerated Spencer’s shoddy science:

The study finds a mismatch between the month-to-month
variations in temperature and cloud cover in models versus the real
world over the past 10 years, said Gavin Schmidt, a NASA Goddard
climatologist. “What this mismatch is due to—data processing, errors
in the data, or real problems in the models—is completely unclear.”

“He’s taken an incorrect model, he’s tweaked it to match observations, but the conclusions you get from that are not correct,” Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, said of Spencer’s new study.

“I cannot believe it got published,” said Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.

In his paper, Spencer relies on a toy model of the climate system
which geochemist Barry Bickmore (a Republican) had previously exposed as
being one that could “give him essentially any answer he wanted, as long as he didn’t mind using parameters that don’t make any physical sense.”

This case is an excellent example of how the right-wing climate
disinformation media machine works. Roy Spencer, one of the handful of
publishing climate scientist ideologues, gets his work into an obscure
journal. Then James Taylor, an operative for a fossil fuel front group,
claims it is “very important” on Forbes.com, a media website owned by a
Republican billionaire. The Forbes blog post was redistributed by Yahoo!
News, giving the headline “New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism”
a further veneer of respectability, even though the full post is
laughably hyperbolic, using “alarmist” or “alarmism” 15 times in nine
paragraphs.

Related Links:

Bill Nye explains science, the moon, and climate change to Fox News, using very small words

Conservative pundits deny existence of record-breaking heat wave

Been there, tried that: ‘Climate Pragmatism’ pushes failed strategy

View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist