Archive

Archive for June, 2010

Energy Engineer / Confidential / Falls Church, VA

June 30th, 2010 admin No comments

Confidential/Falls Church, VA

Exciting Opportunity for an Energy Engineer
Falls Church, Virginia
LOCAL CANDIDATES ONLY, PLEASE

Small and growing energy and sustainable design consulting company in Falls Church, VA looking for Energy Engineer, 0-5 years experience.

Tasks will include energy auditing, energy simulation modeling, LEED project participation, building commissioning participation and energy efficiency research and project development; energy simulation modeling experience, building commissioning experience.

Must have knowledge of building systems and energy consumption issues.

Ideal candidate will have 2 – 5 years experience; Engineering degree a plus, but not required.

Competitive salary, medical, 401k, creative and energetic work environment;
significant growth potential.



Apply To Job

View full post on GreenBiz Jobs

Portugal’s eco-city, Amazon’s ugly HQ, and more urban notes

June 30th, 2010 admin No comments

by Jonathan Hiskes.

Progress toward a
sustainable future may be stalled in the Senate, but there’s a ton of news and
interesting research happening at the local level on the broad topic of
improving built spaces—cities, towns, buildings, transportation systems, etc.
A quick roundup from the local solutions beat:

PlanIT Valley: Portugal’s planning to build a
new green city and tech innovation center
(“a new Silicon Valley”) from the
ground up, with the help of networking giant Cisco. The $10 billion project is
designed to hold 225,000 people and produce “negligible” greenhouse gas
emissions with the help of ubiquitous smart grid technology. And yes, planned
cities like “PlanIT Valley
have a terrible track record, so it makes sense to be skeptical. The best way
to understand PlanIT Valley, oddly enough, is to read about a totally different
Cisco city, South Korea’s New Songdo, in Greg
Lindsey’s excellent Fast Company story
from February.

Los Angeles invests in transit-oriented development, breaking
ground
on a $690 million, 11.3-mile light-rail extension that planners hope
will inspire compact development.

“There’s something about rail that creates an anchor
for economic development,” Michael Cano, county transportation deputy, tells
the L.A. Times.

In Seattle, Amazon
gets slammed
for its hulking, monolithic new headquarters:

Architecturally, in a word: ugh.

Amazon.com is an international icon, a world-renowned
success story of the Internet Age. Given Amazon’s stature and wealth, one might
expect a world HQ design that was daring, or fun, or unconventional in some
inspiring, creative way.  Or at least
better than the typical sterile office towers that litter U.S. cities from
Phoenix to Charlotte and everywhere in between.

Over at Worldchanging, Alex Steffen explores the impact of the Chinese city-building boom and brings the optimism:

Is a bright green China even possible? Perhaps more
possible than we usually think. Many people in the U.S. and Europe start from
the assumption that China will behave in the future as it did in the past: slap
up sprawling cities of shoddy, inefficient buildings, powered by dirty coal and
driven economically by toxic manufacturing. But there are signs that China is
already beginning to embrace a different path forward, perhaps preparing to
embrace the idea that a climate-friendly economy is the key to its future prosperity.

On the research front, the Center for Neighborhood Technology
quantifies what we’ve long known: Compact urban development is green
development because it keeps
people out of cars. From its new study, “Transit-Oriented Development &
Climate Change: The Symbiosis
”:

By living in a central city near transit, the average
household can reduce its transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions by 43
percent. The number increases when living near the most location efficient
transit zones, which can result in a 78 percent emission reduction.

And IBM calculates “commuter pain”—an aggregate of commuting
time, stuck-in-traffic time, and driving-caused stress—in 20 major cities. Turns
out Los Angeles isn’t the king of gridlock—Beijing, Mexico City, and Johannesburg have
it much worse
. Here’s the graphic (which is surprisingly low-fi for IBM):

 

After breaking an ankle, Sightline research fellow Roger
Valdez learns firsthand
about an often-overlooked transportation measure:
access for the disabled. He discovers:

The obstacles for a disabled person using a walker, wheel
chair, or cane are pretty obvious: high curbs, lack of ramps, and poorly placed
street furniture-benches, planters, and kiosks. The typical solutions are also
obvious: places to rest or sit, intervals between posts and signage,
appropriate width and passing space, and the elimination of protruding objects
and steep edges. Taking a trip on crutches, these were the kinds of things that
I really began noticing all over my neighborhood. Even a subtle difference in
the grade of a staircase could be the difference between mild and major
exertion.

Related Links:

Watch oiled politicians get the scrubdown and other spill-inspired ads

Hurricane Alex delays Gulf oil cleanup efforts

Fannie and Freddie bring down Boulder clean-energy finance program






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Incoming search terms for the article:

Chicken expert Gail Damerow answers newbie questions

June 30th, 2010 admin No comments

by Bonnie Azab Powell.

Cluck, cluck, cluck. Bwaak!

These are not sounds I expect to hear on a stroll in
my North Oakland, Calif. neighborhood—the usual soundtrack is more like
thumping bass, sirens, and the rattle of fast-food paper bags. And yet chickens
are pecking in backyards on practically every block, in converted sheds and
rickety but raccoon-proof enclosures.

Where
I live, it’s mostly a matter of economics: chicken feed is cheap, and fresh,
tasty orange-yolked eggs are expensive. Around the country, though, it’s safe
to say that keeping chickens has never enjoyed as much cachet as it does now.
Some cities are more chicken-friendly than others: the Municode Library website can
usually tell you whether your city allows chickens, how many and what sex; just
find your hometown and search its code for “chickens.”

I’ve been thinking about taking the poultry plunge myself, but I decided to get some expert advice first.

If
these tiny-brained feathered friends are the Boston terriers of their decade,
then Gail Damerow is poultry’s Cesar Millan.
In the last 40 years, she’s raised dozens of different breeds and written Barnyard in Your Backyard and several other
animal-care handbooks. But she’s best known for Storey’s Guide to Raising Chickens, now in its third edition. It’s the primer for all things chicken:
from training your birds (yes, you can, although they probably won’t fetch for
you) to keeping predators at bay to designing and building your own backyard
coop. (Speaking of coops, we’re putting together a slideshow of cool coops for
city chickens for Friday—if you’re proud of your poultry’s pad, send us a photo and caption!)

Gail
graciously consented to answer my poultry-newbie questions by phone and email
from her farm in Tennessee’s Upper Cumberland.

Q. Can chickens really thrive in a small city backyard, or do they need
real room to range?

A. Chickens can get along quite
well in a small amount of space, provided they have adequate food and water,
and their environment is kept clean. The main issue is finding things for them
to do to keep from getting bored and picking on each other (like siblings
cooped up in the back seat of the family sedan). The best chicken toys involve
food that cannot be eaten quickly—such as a head of fresh lettuce or cabbage
hung from a string so the chickens can peck at it.

Q. How big does a coop need to be?

A. For
the enclosed portion of the coop, I’d want at least 3 square feet for
lightweight laying breeds such as the Leghorn and 4 square feet for heavier,
dual-purpose (meat and egg-laying) breeds such as the Rhode Island Red. For the
chicken run, more is always better, but total living space (indoors and out) of
7.5 square feet per bird should be adequate.

Q. Is there any advantage to having four
or more chickens versus two?

A. Chickens
are flock animals that like company. I think three or four would develop a more
comfortable social order, unless the facility isn’t big enough for the one
lowest in the pecking order to get away from others. (As long as you have at
least two chickens, one is always lowest in peck order.)

Q. Can chickens and raised vegetable beds
co-exist happily in a backyard?

A. When
the garden is in, the chickens will need supervision so they don’t eat or scratch
up emerging seedlings or peck holes in ripening strawberries or tomatoes, etc.
Also for safety’s sake, fresh chicken poop should be kept away from root
crops for 120 days prior to harvest, and from other crops for 90 days, although
people who raise chickens (who are around chickens, handle them, clean the
coop, etc.) are less likely to be affected by potential poultry pathogens from
garden produce.

Q. Are people better off building a simple coop with a run, or
buying one of the pricy ready-made models like the 
Omlet Eglu?

A. That’s
a tough one. Some of the ready-made models are nice, but some look a little
iffy, especially for times when chickens don’t want to be outdoors, like during
several days of torrential rain or in freezing cold weather.

On
the other hand, I’ve seen chicken shelters built by people who shouldn’t be
allowed to use a hammer. You have to think about an awful lot of things, not
the least of which is the safety of the chickens (no protruding nails, good
ventilation but not drafty, insulation, predator proofing, etc.), as well as
how to efficiently position the feed, water, perches, nests, and doorways. Lots
of different styles of chicken coops have been designed, but none is perfect. I
have lived in the same location for nearly 30 years and have lost track of how
many times we’ve remodeled our chicken housing; we just finished remodeling our
layer house in mid-June. People always ask me for the definitive coop design,
but there is no such thing.

[Readers, if you disagree and think you’ve um, nailed it: send us a photo of your coop for Friday’s slideshow.]

Q. Your books do, however, offer a sketch
for a good workable coop.

A. Yes,
on page 78 of the current edition of Guide
to Raising Chickens
is my concept of an ideal 4-by-12-foot stationary
chicken house for a small backyard situation such as an urban one [above]. It comfortably
fits four chickens of a large breed, five to six of a light breed, and up to
eight small bantams. It’s completely covered and has platforms at three levels
designed to prevent boredom by offering a variety of environments. The upper
one-third is entirely enclosed and is where they sleep and lay; the middle
one-third is open-air and is where they eat and drink; the final one-third is
at ground level to provide an area for scratching and dusting (kind of like a
sandbox play area) from which the chickens can be let out to roam.

We
like the upper 4×4 living platform high enough to be cleaned, and eggs
gathered, by a person standing up. (My husband is 6’ tall and gets tired of
banging his head on low overhangs.) The upper and middle platforms have slat
floors, although in really cold weather the upper platform should have a piece
of plywood added to keep out night time drafts. If the two upper platforms had
solid floors with bedding, the chickens could use the underneath part as a run,
but the platforms would have to be cleaned often—at least once a week.

With
the slats, poop falls beneath the upper and middle platforms, into an area
protected by hardware cloth (also called welded wire or rabbit wire; everyone
calls it something different) to keep the chicken from scratching in the poop.
By occasionally tossing shavings onto the poop, odor and flies are kept to a
minimum and cleaning doesn’t need to be done until the accumulation becomes
offensive. The front wire panel is removable for when the accumulation needs to
be cleaned out. Don’t get me started on this, but… you could easily modify this area to accommodate a worm bin.

The
bottom 4×4 section might be considered a run. It could be bedded with wood
chips, shredded paper, dried leaves and grass clippings, etc., but I prefer
sand the chickens can dust in (they will dust in the bedding, but it’s not as
good for getting rid of parasites). Chickens do need a place for dusting, so
don’t forget that part in your plan.

Q. Chicken poop makes great fertilizer, I
hear, once composted. How much waste we are talking about per week?

A. That
depends on what’s used for bedding, how much, how often changed, etc. And also
on the moisture content of the manure. A good guesstimate is approximately a
pound of poop per week per chicken. Since they “go” all  night
long, a lot will be piled beneath the perch—in my plan, it accumulates
beneath the upper platform. The rest will be spread around the run and trampled
into the dirt/sand/grass.

Q. If I feed my chickens kitchen scraps,
about how much grain do I also need to feed them per bird for optimum laying?

A. No
grain at all, please, unless it’s sprouted. Grain tends to make hens fat, and
fat hens don’t lay well. About two pounds per week of layer ration, such as
Purina Layena, per hen. It’s possible to feed chickens without using commercial
rations, but you would need to bone up on the nutritional properties of
available feedstuffs and the nutritional needs of chickens.

Q. How many eggs will a hen lay over her
lifespan?

A. Lightweight
laying breeds start laying at about 18-22 weeks; others at 22-24 weeks. We’ve
been talking here about the “average” chicken, but to be precise we
would need to know what kind of chickens: bantams (which are very popular) need
less space, eat less, and lay smaller eggs; lightweight breeds (so called layer
breeds, and I assume what we’ve been talking about here), or heavy breeds,
which are generally more sedate and less flighty than the layer breeds, but
need more space, eat more, and  lay fewer but bigger eggs.

Pullets,
or young chickens, will generally lay through the first winter. After that,
hens generally stop laying as day length decreases in the fall, unless provided
with lighting to augment natural light for a total of 15 hours per day. So on
average—again, depending on the breed, feed, and management—a hen lays
about 240-250 eggs per year; pretty good would be 300 per year. After each year
of laying, the number of eggs decreases and the size increases.

A
caveat: fat hens don’t lay well, so an overfed hen will produce fewer eggs and
will stop laying at a younger age. People with just a few hens tend to pamper
them by overfeeding carbohydrates, which chickens love. Table scraps such as lettuce
leaves and other vegetables are good; more than the occasional bit of stale
cake or Wonder bread, or excessive amounts of grain, is bad.

Q. City dwellers are used to paying $4 to
even $8 per dozen for eggs from chickens raised on pasture. Will my backyard
eggs be as tasty, and will they end up being more economical, even if I opt for
organic feed?

A. They
will seem tastier because they come from your own hens, and they will be tastier because they’re fresher (what could be fresher than from nest to frying
pan?). The economics depend on the price of the feed, how much the price can be
reduced by judiciously feeding kitchen or garden scraps, and how many eggs the
hens lay. Using averages, let’s do the math: A hen eats two pounds of rations
per week or about 100 pounds per year, during which she lays about 240 or 20
dozen eggs. At $4 per dozen, the break-even point for the cost of layer ration
would be $80 per 100 pounds. The all-natural layer ration I use costs about $25
per 100 pounds. What’s not to like about raising your own hens?

Related Links:

DC’s Common Good City Farm: ‘Museum farm’ or real deal?

Keeping up with Jones Valley Urban Farm

Breaking Through Concrete: Stories from the American urban farm






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Website Developer / inNative / Berkeley, CA

June 30th, 2010 admin No comments

inNative/Berkeley, CA (Bay Area)

inNative provides energy/water/waste site assessments, supply-chain (Scope III) greenhouse gas inventories, environmental metrics evelopment, and performance evaluation services. We are seeking a motivated individual to create our website.

Requirements:
- be organized and self-managing
- able to conduct web-based research
- able to conduct work without financial compensation

Experience with web programming is a plus

Work will begin immediately and is expected to be complete in two months.

Please send a cover letter explaining why you are interested in the position as well as a resume. Thank you for your interest!

Apply To Job

View full post on GreenBiz Jobs

An ode to my new push reel lawn mower

June 30th, 2010 admin No comments

by Lisa Hymas.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a new homeowner
in possession of a good lawn must be in want of a lawn mower.  Unless you have access to a herd of
goats
, or you’re an aggressive gardener with immediate plans to xeriscape or cover all terrain with edible plants.  

My significant other and I have started off with modest
ambitions at our new homestead: keeping our small parcel of grass from
degenerating into a weedy jungle.

A gas-powered mower was out from the start.  Smelly, dirty, hugely polluting,
and a pain to operate and maintain. 

We borrowed a friend’s corded electric mower a couple of
times, but juggling that cord around was exasperating.  And good electric mowers without a cord
run steep, in the $400 range.

Anyway, I knew from the start that I wanted to go sleek and
simple and uber-green: a push reel mower, powered only by my own muscle. 

I consulted Consumer Reports (.
req.
) and other reviewers, and they all pointed to one top contender, out
new this year: the Fiskars
Momentum
.  I rushed out and
bought one.  Well, actually, I
rushed out and tried to buy one, but
they had flown off the shelves of my local home-improvement store, so I had to
sit tight a few days until the next batch came in.  It was worth the wait. 

Made by the Finnish
company
famous for its orange-handled scissors, this isn’t your mother’s
push reel mower.  It’s got an
entirely original design with a flywheel-type system that makes it run more
efficiently, and tough, sharp blades that can push through small twigs and dense weeds without a problem.
It was a snap to put together out of the box, even for a non-handy
person like myself, and its elegant design has just one lever to
fuss with, which easily adjusts the cut height from one to four inches. 

It wasn’t the cheapest mower around.  I got mine for $200.  Fiskars’ list price is $250, and online
I see prices as high as $270.  But
consider that you’ll spend no money on gas over the lifetime of the machine,
and Fiskars claims it will be almost maintenance-free (and backs that claim up
with a four-year warranty). 

A couple of drawbacks: It won’t cut really long grass, so you can’t let the lawn get out of control between trimmings. It only
works going forward, not backward, unlike gas mowers.  And it operates best on small, flat lawns, they say, so it
might not be ideal for vast, gnarly yards. 

But no matter: I loved it right from the start.  Easy to push.  No fuss, no muss, no fumes.  It’s so deliciously quiet that I
can listen to chirping birds and chatty neighbors while mowing—or my
iPod. 

My S.O. loves the Momentum so much that lately he’s been
mowing the lawn twice a week, just for kicks.  I prefer the yard in a more lush and lazy state, so I might
have to start chaining the mower up on weekdays. 

But don’t just listen to me gush.  Listen
to Martha gush.
  Or listen to
this friendly garden guy gush: 

Next up: Swap out some of our grass for fruits and veggies and try my hand at this whole urban ag thing.  Tom Philpott, expect a few bewildered phone calls … 

Random addendum: If you ever find yourself in Finland
(and doesn’t everyone eventually?), visit Fiskars Village, where the company
was founded as an ironworks in 1649. 
These days, the lovingly restored buildings are home to an artists’
community with charming shops, museums, restaurants, and B&Bs.  You might even spot an otter in the Fiskars River.

Related Links:

Women who can’t get birth control spotlighted in new film—watch it here

Why, yes, mass transit stations should always have a slide

Mos Def and Lenny Kravitz sing the blues for the big blue






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Incoming search terms for the article:

Categories: Working For Jobs Tags: , , ,

The latest in Democratic fecklessness

June 30th, 2010 admin No comments

by David Roberts.

I will never get used to the strategic and tactical fecklessness of the Senate Democrats. After a caucus meeting last week, it seemed like they’d finally stumbled onto the only strategy that has a snowball’s chance in hell of actually working: package a price on carbon with a tough response to the Gulf oil spill, take an impenetrable bill to the floor backed by a unified front, and dare Republicans to oppose it. Put Republicans on the defensive; make sure there’s a political price to pay for opposition, à la the financial reform bill. That is the only way any Republican is going to support any price on carbon: if they are scared to vote against the bill that contains it.

Since then, the party has reverted to form. Some illustrative examples:

• Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) takes to the media to reinforce the point that there’s just no way Dems can get 60 votes for a price on carbon. For some reason, Dem centrists view themselves as pundits, commenting from the sidelines as those wacky liberals fight for solutions commensurate with the nation’s problems.

But as a Democrat, isn’t it Bingaman’s job to help his party pass a tough climate bill? He could just as easily have said, “I believe a price on carbon is the appropriate policy and I’m going to do everything I can to see it passed.”

After all, when a powerful U.S. senator says “there aren’t 60 votes,” he’s not just observing the political situation, he’s shaping it. He is a player in the game, not a referee or a spectator. Every time he says there aren’t enough votes, it reassures Republicans and wavering Dems that they’ll have plenty of cover from the herd if they duck and run. It takes the pressure off. Perhaps Sen. Bingaman would set a better example for his less senior colleagues by refusing to play the game of political analyst and just bearing down to get the job done.

• Today at the White House, President Obama met with a bipartisan group of senators to discuss the energy bill. John Kerry (D-Mass.), the Senate’s champion on climate action, emerged saying, “We believe we have compromised significantly, and we’re prepared to compromise further.” Joe Lieberman (I-Ct.) assured Politico that some unnamed Republicans “promised to keep talking” about a utility-only carbon price. In other news, Lucy promised to keep the football still for Charlie Brown this time.

Kerry, like many well-meaning Democrats, has trouble getting his head around our current era of post-truth politics. He believes (still) that conservatives have substantive, good-faith objections to the policies in his bill, and if he just tweaks those policies, he can overcome those objections. That’s what the utility-only idea is: the latest attempt to overcome political obstacles with policy mechanisms.

It never works. Whatever principles once animated conservatism, all that’s left is a kneejerk opposition to raising federal revenue. Republicans are going to oppose any kind of price on carbon unless they are scared sh*tless that opposing a bill will bring down the wrath of the public. It’s a political dynamic. Climate policy has nothing to do with it. Further compromises are only setting lower and lower benchmarks.

Conservatives will scream bloody murder about any bill Dems put forward. Any bill. Preemptive compromise doesn’t change that fact. Political battles can only be won with politics.

• Yet again today, Obama “expressed support” for putting a price on carbon. Said the White House statement:

Not all of the Senators agreed with this approach, and the President welcomed other approaches and ideas that would take real steps to reduce our dependence on oil, create jobs, strengthen our national security and reduce the pollution in our atmosphere.

Translated into English: The president asked a group of centrist and conservative senators to support action on climate, and they refused. They want to offer subsidies and tax breaks to various favored technologies, but they don’t want to raise the revenue to pay for it.

So that’s that. Right now we are on a glide path to failure. Unless there’s some sort of large jolt, the default outcome is that all polluter-pays provisions drop out of the bill and we end up with some energy-only package of standards and incentives.

What could provide such a big jolt? My cynical D.C. sources say: nothing. Everyone knows the votes aren’t there and everyone’s playacting and insisting on a carbon price would be so much windmill-tilting. Then again, the inside players never saw the wave coming on financial reform and that bill ended up defying political gravity.

The question remains what it has been for months now: Will the White House jump in with both feet? Or will they “express support” as carbon pricing drifts away like the public option? Only Obama can lead the national discussion and education that could get the public involved on this.

Related Links:

GOP puts party over planet, claims pollution is energy

Senate oil savings’ greatest hits

White House climate-bill meeting ends with a whimper






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Incoming search terms for the article:

Community Energy Manager / Pacific Gas and Electric / San Francisco, CA

June 29th, 2010 admin No comments

Pacific Gas and Electric/San Francisco, CA

Community Energy Manager, Sustainability – San Francisco, CA

Department Overview

Green/Sustainable Communities is a new group within Energy Solutions and Service Operations (ES&S) delivering a holistic service offering to local governments focused on sustainable energy management and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction. This approach will be a model for all of Energy Solutions and Service around how to position our energy efficiency programs (and increase their uptake) within the larger sustainability goals of our customers. The Community Energy Manager (CEM) will serve as the lead PG&E representative in a Utility Local Government (LG) program, to assist cities in their vision to accomplish measurable GHG reduction. This approach will be at a community-wide scale and will include assessment of emissions/energy usage across all major sectors within a given city. Hiring for these positions (eight in total) will take place across PG&E's service territory.

Position Summary

We are seeking a highly motivated, visionary individual, passionate about the environment/sustainability, with excellent presentation, sales and collaborative skills. This role will require a person with a high level of customer focus, creativity and political savvy. The ability to blend and reconcile the goals and desires of multiple stakeholders, while being sensitive to internal and external political environments will be critical. CEMs will support and partner closely with our Government Relations Team along with Energy Solutions & Service Account Executives and their Managers.

The work will include a mix of office time, community field meetings and some travel. Occasional weekends and evening work may be required for community/ regional government events.

Responsibilities:

• Compliance and Safety:
• Work safely and in compliance at all times with legal, regulatory and ethical standards.
• Fully utilize PG&E's Customer Management Tool (CMT) and other systems to document and report all work activities and expenses.
• Provide weekly reports/updates to supervisor.

• Community Scale Energy and Relationship Management:
• Collaborate with Local Government and community leaders to build upon and further develop their energy vision and plan.
• Utilize community scale data analysis to develop recommendations/ goals along with input from Account Executives, Government Relations and Program Staff.
• Manage community energy as a portfolio and deploy PG&E resources to help meet community GHG, energy and other sustainability targets.
• Increase Integrated Demand Side Management (IDSM) program uptake.
• Engage key stakeholders (e.g. LG Climate Action Team/Green Task Force and the public).
• Provide feedback to the community and co-branding, recognition.
• Speak at or attend local city events in support of the overall energy/ sustainability plan.

• Project Management and Performance Tracking:
• Ensure Utility resources are coordinated and on track to implement a comprehensive energy solution
• Communicate results and any challenges to PG&E and Local Government Team.
• Track comprehensive energy recommendations/ goals for community and customer segments.

• Peer Exchange and Internal Relationship Management/Support:
• Work with Community Energy Managers system-wide to share best practices and improve processes for delivering IDSM and community scale energy management.
• Regularly collaborate and maintain supportive relationships with Government Relations and Energy Solutions and Service Account Executives.
• Support Account Executive's work with assigned customers, to encourage participation in IDSM programs as part of a community scale sustainability effort.

Qualifications

Required:
• BS/BA degree in business, technical or related field
• Ability to apply portfolio-based consultative sales skills as well as the technical skills to understand, explain and recognize opportunities to work with energy end use systems and IDSM measures/techniques
• Knowledge of and interest in local government processes and local government roles in climate action planning, including opportunities to leverage resources outside PG&E
• Knowledge of energy industry; gas and electric transmission and distribution systems (including generation and self-generation); PG&E rates, tariffs, and contracts; PG&E products and services (such as customer energy efficiency, load management programs and Internet based tools and resources, core and non-core gas service, direct access).
• Excels in a team environment and models a collaborative spirit
• Strong interpersonal and communication skills, specifically to facilitate both the technical and human component of organizational planning and goal setting
• Ability to speak diplomatically on behalf of PG&E with outside organizations
• Strong sense of awareness and savvy in political situations
• Sense of mission and vision of the Utility Role in GHG reduction
• Customer focus and ability to build agreement among multiple stakeholders and customers
• Takes personal accountability for achieving results with strong follow-through
• Coachable and committed to continuous learning
• 6+ years of relevant work experience
• Valid driver's license and willingness to use personal vehicle for reimbursed company mileage

Desired:
• Specialized knowledge of sustainability communications and customer motivations
• LEED AP
• MA in engineering, environmental management, sustainable business management or similar
• 2-5 years of innovation experience
• Account management and local government experience
• Strong critical thinking and problem-solving orientation (out-of-the box solutions)
• Resourcefulness and an openness to Change (Adaptability)

Pacific Gas and Electric Company is an AA/EEO employer that actively pursues and hires a diverse workforce.

* If interested, please go to http://www.pge.com/about/careers/ please reference job number 10001162 in the search field.



Apply To Job

View full post on GreenBiz Jobs

Incoming search terms for the article:

Democratic fecklessness imperils climate bill again

June 29th, 2010 admin No comments

by David Roberts.

At this point I have to accept the fact that I will never, ever get used to the sheer strategic and tactical incompetence of the Senate Democratic caucus. It always manages to shock me all over again.

After a caucus meeting last week, it seemed like they’d finally stumbled onto the only strategy that has a snowball’s chance in hell of actually working: package a price on carbon with a tough response to the Gulf oil spill, take an impenetrable bill to the floor backed by a unified front, and dare Republicans to oppose it. Put Republicans on the defensive; make sure there’s a political price to pay for opposition, à la the financial reform bill. That is the only way any Republican is going to support any kind of price on carbon: if they are scared to vote against the bill that contains it.

Since then, the party has reverted to form. Let’s look at some illustrative examples:

• Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), in classic form, takes to the media to reinforce the point that there’s just no way Dems can get 60 votes for a price on carbon. For some reason, Dem centrists view themselves as amateur pundits, commenting from the sidelines as those wacky liberals fight for solutions commensurate with the nation’s problems.

But as a Democrat, isn’t it Bingaman’s job to help his party pass a tough climate bill? He could just as easily have said, “I believe a price on carbon is the appropriate policy and I’m going to do everything I can to see it passed.”

After all, when a powerful U.S. senator says “there aren’t 60 votes,” he’s not just observing the political situation, he’s shaping it. He is a player in the game, not a referee or a spectator. Every time he says there aren’t enough votes, it reassures Republicans and wavering Dems that they’ll have plenty of cover from the herd if they duck and run. It takes the pressure off.

Perhaps Sen. Bingaman would set a better example for his less senior colleagues by refusing to play the game of political analyst and just bearing down to get the job done.

• Today at the White House, President Obama met with a bipartisan group of senators to discuss the energy bill. What does John Kerry (D-Mass.), the Senate’s champion on climate action, say upon emerging? “We believe we have compromised significantly, and we’re prepared to compromise further.” Churchill had nothing on this guy.

Kerry, bless his heart, is Exhibit A in the Democrats failure to understand our current era of post-truth politics. He believes—still!—that conservatives have substantive, good-faith objections to the policies in his bill, and if he just tweaks those policies, he can overcome those objections. That’s what all the talk of a utility-only cap is about. It’s just the latest attempt by Dems to overcome political obstacles with policy mechanisms. It never works.

Whatever principles once animated conservatism, all that’s left is a kneejerk opposition to raising federal revenue. Republicans are going to oppose any kind of price on carbon unless they are scared sh*tless that opposing a bill will bring down the wrath of the public. It’s a political dynamic. Climate policy has nothing to do with it. Further compromises are only setting lower and lower benchmarks for the next battle.

Conservatives will scream bloody murder about any bill Dems put forward—period, full stop. Any bill. Kerry can compromise until there’s nothing left to compromise (and we’re just about there) and it won’t change that fact. You fight politics with politics.

• Yet again today, Obama “expressed support” for putting a price on carbon. Said the White House statement:

Not all of the Senators agreed with this approach, and the President welcomed other approaches and ideas that would take real steps to reduce our dependence on oil, create jobs, strengthen our national security and reduce the pollution in our atmosphere.

Translated into English: The president asked a group of centrist and conservative senators to support action on climate, and they refused. They want to offer subsidies and tax breaks to various favored technologies, but they don’t want to raise the revenue to pay for it.

So that’s that. Right now we are on a glide path to failure. Unless there’s some sort of large jolt, the default outcome is that all polluter-pays provisions drop out of the bill and we end up with some energy-only package of standards and incentives.

What could provide such a big jolt? My cynical D.C. sources say: nothing. Everyone knows the votes aren’t there and everyone’s playacting and insisting on a carbon price would be so much windmill-tilting. Then again, the inside players never saw the wave coming on financial reform and that bill ended up defying political gravity.

The question remains what it has been for months now: Will the White House jump in with both feet? Or will they “express support” as carbon pricing drifts away like the public option? Only Obama can lead the national discussion and education that could get the public involved on this.

Related Links:

GOP puts party over planet, claims pollution is energy

Senate oil savings’ greatest hits

White House climate-bill meeting ends with a whimper






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Live chat with Tom Philpott and Jonathan Hiskes

June 29th, 2010 admin No comments

by Grist.

Yo Grist faithful, Food Editor Tom Philpott and Staff Writer
Jonathan Hiskes are joining forces for a live chat about where the Gulf oil
spill is creeping—politically and ecologically—and how it connects to the
clean-energy future.

Join us Thursday,
July 1, 2010
at 3 p.m. Pacific (6 p.m. Eastern) to discuss all the oily
details. If you want to bone up, here are a few slick links: Tom’s been digging
deep on
the nasty dispersants
BP’s been dumping into the Gulf, the agrochemical
runoff
that’s been hurting the Gulf long before BP’s screwup, and the
biodiversity at stake.

Jonathan’s been
reporting on the sticky political fallout of the spill, President Obama’s difficult
dance
around the fiasco, and constructive
responses
that cities and towns can take to kick the offshore habit.

Bring your questions, comments,
feedback, and your lovely selves back here on Thursday. You can sign up for a reminder below. Hope to see you then!

<a href=“http://www.coveritlive.com/mobile.php/option=com_mobile/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=bd61cb957c” >Tom Philpott and Jonathan Hiskes chat live on the Gulf oil spill</a>

Related Links:

Expert measures human cost of Gulf oil leak

What would happen if we admitted to the high risk of deepwater drilling?

‘Hands Across the Sand’ protests are a hit [SLIDESHOW]






View full post on Grist – the latest from Grist

Educator – Los Angeles

June 29th, 2010 admin No comments

ACE – Alliance for Climate Education.
CA – California, Los Angeles
Alliance for Climate Education (ACE) performs interactive assembly presentations for high school students that explain climate change and its effect on our planet drawing from the most recent climate science….

Salary: n/a. Date posted: 06/29/2010

View full post on Great Green Careers RSS Feed

Categories: Green Jobs Tags: ,